The customer’s not always right
Friday, April 28th, 2006It used to be that the customer was always right. And even if they weren’t right, they were treated like they were. It was standard business, a way of guaranteeing the customer left satisfied and would return. I don’t think it’s that way so much anymore. In fact, even when the customer is right, I’ve learned they aren’t always treated that way.
Because I’m a bit of a mouse, I generally avoid conflict and seldom complain. The few times I have, it wasn’t apologies I received, but excuses.
Sadly, it isn’t just the big boys, the WalMarts and Exxons, with so many customers that losing a spattering of disgruntleds won’t make a dent. Now, even some service-oriented businesses are mumbling excuses rather than offering apologies. Recently for me, the excuses were with regard to questionable veterinary care.
Our saga began when I took our new pup to the vet and mentioned he’d been scratching his ears. The vet–one I’d admired and trusted for about 20 years–found a small spot of mange on the edge of his ears. Because mange is highly contagious, the vet said both our dogs would need immediate treatment, so my husband hurried our other dog in so both could be dipped.
Although I’ve had dogs all my life, I’d never had an encounter with mange. When this vet prescribed dipping, I deferred to her wisdom, even though I worried the pup was too young and too small and that Murry, who is terrified of baths, might hyperventilate and breathe in too much of the fumes. But the vet was aware of those things. And like I said, I trusted her.
When I arrived to retrieve my boys, they were both dripping wet. Without a word of caution, they were delivered to me, and into my car the saturated dogs went. By the time we arrived home, I was saturated as well. Still, I thought, how bad could it be if it was safe enough for a dog as little as ours?
Once at home, though, the dogs barely moved. They dropped by the door and there they remained. Not eating. Not drinking. I was scared they might die.
And then I got sick myself. In hindsight, I feel dumb that I didn’t connect my own illness with their chemical treatment. My dripping-wet boys had been in my car, had slept on me in bed. But I’d been having health problems already and assumed those problems were worsening. A doctor bill later, my problem was not identified until we visited a different vet a week later. (Yes, I was diagnosed by a vet. Stop snickering. It’s not funny.)
I made several calls asking vets about sarcoptic mange and whether it would be safe to dip a puppy so young and little (under four months and right at 9 lbs.). Each said–with varying degrees of anger and passion–that dipping is never appropriate in such a case. There are safer, less expensive treatments that not only get rid of mange, but also protect against heartworm and fleas at the same time. (The original vet sold us separate medications for those.)
Thankfully, both dogs survived, although both ended up battling a case of kennel cough, too. Once we were all healthy again, I began to stew over the idea that we’d paid so much without being told there had been other options, that we hadn’t been warned of the dangers to our pup (or to us), and that the bill had been stacked with medications we wouldn’t have needed had the most reasonable (and affordable) course of treatment been prescribed from the start.
But like I said up there at the top, I’m a bit of a mouse. I’m fortunate, however, that my husband is not. He went back to the vet seeking a refund, an apology, or an explanation.
Instead, he got an excuse. They stood firm on their course of treatment and refused to admit they may have been wrong. They wouldn’t even admit they should have told us about other treatment options in order that we could have decided which way to go.
It didn’t matter that the customer had product literature from the dip manufacturer saying it wasn’t safe for dogs the size and age of our pup–the customer was wrong. It didn’t matter that the customer had other vets who said our dogs had been given an expensive and irresponsible course of treatment–the customer was wrong.
And I suppose maybe they’re right.
The customer was wrong to have trusted them. Wrong not to have voiced her concerns at the start. Wrong not to have questioned the rationale behind risking the life of such a young, tiny dog to stop an itch.
And wrong to believe such a money-motivated business might do the right thing.





